The Advocate

Editorial: Hate is present

Racist graffiti shocks Diablo Valley College campus

By Editorial Board

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






Much has been written about the increase in hate crimes over the past three years. According to the FBI’s Uniform Crime Report they have increased 17 percent from 2016-17.

California is not immune to such an unexpected hike in hate and despite the appearance of a liberal-leaning population, the state has seen its fair share of these egregious crimes.

Surprisingly, Contra Costa County reported the same number of incidents that fit into the broad category of hate crimes, 21 in 2017 that were reported in the previous year.

This bodes well for this area of the East Bay. However, when incidents do occur, their rarity may compromise official responses.

Earlier this month, racist graffiti depicting a stick figure being lynched with the words “No ni**ers in trades” was discovered in a bathroom of the Engineering and Technology Building on sister school Diablo Valley College’s campus.

The vandalism was discovered at approximately 3:30 p.m. on the afternoon of March 6 followed by an email condemning the act some six hours later, at 9:23 p.m., by DVC President Susan Lamb.

Lamb’s initial email explicitly states, “Both rest rooms were closed and the messages were photographed and removed.”

However, points of contention were uncovered in her statement when, two days later, DVC students who entered the rest room saw the offensive imagery had not been removed and had only been covered with an X.

Images of the graffiti, and the X that attempted to cover it, were sent to the DVC Enquirer courtesy of student Panda De La Torre two days later on March 8.

Nowhere in Lamb’s email did she directly address African-American students, the actual target of the offense. She instead opted to offer support for all students.

To be clear, the message was not directed at all students. It was directed at black students.

In response, DVC students organized a rally a week later to voice their concerns and proposals for change to DVC administrators.

Students who attended the rally spoke of a culture of intolerance that undermines the otherwise quiet Pleasant Hill campus.

Surprisingly, in data from the California Attorney General’s Office, only one hate crime was reported in the city in 2017.

With roughly 5.5 percent of DVC’s student body identifying as African-American, accompanied by state data that shows hate crime reporting in the area surrounding the campus at near zero levels, college administrators’ laissez-faire approach to racial problems is predictable.

It’s also irresponsible and speaks to the disconnect between the plight of African-American students and administrators from different backgrounds who purportedly work to serve them.

The Attorney General’s data also shows anti-African-American hate crimes disproportionately outnumber hate crimes committed against other races.

With more than 50 percent of hate crimes being identified as racially motivated in California, African-Americans incur the brunt of these attacks and are over 27 percent of the reported victims.

Will it take a physical attack for administrators to properly respond?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
1 Comment

One Response to “Editorial: Hate is present”

  1. hmm on March 31st, 2019 9:27 am

    The article clearly states that hate crimes in the surrounding area, Pleasant Hill, are at near zero levels. Why would the author believe that a physical attack would be next? One thing could be drawn from the evidence. Perhaps, on orders from Pleasant Hill P.D. or the F.B.I. ; which has a branch in downtown concord, administrators were never given permission by investigators to take down what appears to be the only evidence linking the suspect to their crime. It’s clear administrators should have kept the restroom closed and supplied a mobile restroom for students until the end of the investigation was over if that was the case. Perhaps the author could be a tad more empathetic and ask the tough question. Did a lack of dealing with hate crimes at the school cause what was clearly a mistake by the administration by leaving the graffiti? Does the administration know who put an X through the evidence? Clearly the evidence was preserved through pictures and the obvious practical thing to do would have been to scour the writing out of existence and open up the restroom again. But the writer should understand that while administrators have degrees from learned institutions typically they lack common sense. when the hate crime is finally solve I wonder if the writer will report the findings. I would assume they would if the suspect turns out to be the grimy white tradesman the evidence has shown him to be. But I wonder if the writer will follow up or even care if this crime was staged like so many other hate crimes in the past two years

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.




Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






The Student Voice Of Contra Costa College, San Pablo, Calif.
Editorial: Hate is present